<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enabling BCC and From fields</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msoutlook.info/question/121/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msoutlook.info/question/121</link>
	<description>Real World Questions, Real World Answers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:37:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t add FW: and header when forwarding a message &#124; MSOutlook.info</title>
		<link>http://www.msoutlook.info/question/121/comment-page-1#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t add FW: and header when forwarding a message &#124; MSOutlook.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msoutlook.info/?p=121#comment-291</guid>
		<description>[...] the From field will be exposed when using this feature but it case it doesn’t for you, see this post on how to enable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the From field will be exposed when using this feature but it case it doesn’t for you, see this post on how to enable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiding recipients with distribution lists &#124; MSOutlook.info</title>
		<link>http://www.msoutlook.info/question/121/comment-page-1#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiding recipients with distribution lists &#124; MSOutlook.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msoutlook.info/?p=121#comment-238</guid>
		<description>[...] without exposing the addresses. The easiest is to put the client-side distribution list into the BCC field instead. This basically instructs the mail server to take off the address label before delivering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] without exposing the addresses. The easiest is to put the client-side distribution list into the BCC field instead. This basically instructs the mail server to take off the address label before delivering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
